Debate : 13769


Off-Topic / Debate / 13769	13768 \| 13770

Subject:	Re: PA censoring journalists again, but repudiating bin Laden...
Newsgroups:	lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date:	Thu, 11 Oct 2001 05:15:34 GMT
Viewed:	287 times

In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes: > > > Is this "censoring" really any worse than this: > > US urges curb on Arab TV channel > http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/americas/newsid_1578000/1578619.stm > ==+== > Washington has asked Qatar to reign in the influential and editorially > independent Arabic al-Jazeera television station, which gives airtime to > anti-American opinions. > ==+== Here's a bit more. http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/000/349xmyff.asp They draw the conclusion that Powell may be overreacting a bit, and I tend to agree.

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: PA censoring journalists again, but repudiating bin Laden...
(...) I loved this line: ==+== National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice criticized Al Jazeera for the broadcast, on the grounds that, among other things, it could be used to send coded messages to terrorist "sleepers" in the United States and (...) (23 years ago, 11-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: PA censoring journalists again, but repudiating bin Laden...
Is this "censoring" really any worse than this: US urges curb on Arab TV channel (URL) has asked Qatar to reign in the influential and editorially independent Arabic al-Jazeera television station, which gives airtime to anti-American opinions. (...) (23 years ago, 10-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

117 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search