Subject:
|
Re: ScottFroth(tm) answered
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 11 Oct 2001 08:01:24 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2409 times
|
| |
|
|
I like this. I may get a t-shirt made. :)
> Scott
>
> Debating skill: 4
> Cluelessness: 3
> Stubbornness: 9
> Openness: 4
> Humility: 5
> Annoying: 8
>
> Notes:
> Scott's generally got some work to do on debating form. This is quite
> possibly his largest issue. He seems to take o-t-debate as a very fast-paced
> forum, paying little time towards each reply. Replies are often quickly put
> out, with little organization or thought involved.
I live in a tiny little country called Scotland. The time differnce between
my lovely little land and you great hulk mass (I'm talking about the USA,
not you :) ) means that most of the posting goes on when I'm sound asleep or
spending time with my familiy. This means that I tend to reply in bursts.
Scott A
> They do not seem to
> follow the general debating format wherein one would state one's
> assumptions, the problems with the proposed theory, then propose a new
> theory, admitting any weaknesses it had.
>
> But don't assume too quickly. Scott often has a point, even though it's not
> stated well. It's merely that he doesn't put the time/effort into voicing
> it. When forced (upon occasion), Scott has proven that he is fully capable
> of being less clueless, more open, and more insightful.
>
> He also suffers from stubbornness. He doesn't let an issue drop very easily,
> and often prods and prods and prods until a response is given. Further, when
> cornered, he doesn't like admitting his faults. The one upshot to Scott over
> Larry is that Scott is typically less assuming of his own position being
> "right". You'll seldom hear Scott defending his own stance, and more often
> hear him attacking others'.
>
> ----------
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: ScottFroth(tm) answered
|
| (...) I doubt most o-t-debators would choose seriously from any of the above options other than the 3rd, though maybe that's just me. I can't see actually wanting to ban either of you based on your previous content. A poll to the first set of (...) (25 years ago, 10-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
118 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
