 | | "The Propaganda War" from the Economist —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | (URL) the subhead: "The shadow of Saddam" My opinion that the sanctions are not the CAUSE of Iraqi suffering is not some sort of lone voice in the wilderness, it's held by others as well. "The true cause of those deaths is Saddam. Although sanctions (...) (23 years ago, 10-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: "The Propaganda War" from the Economist —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | Larry that was your opinion before the 10th October (the date on the text). What informed your opinion before then? Why the sudden change of heart in justifying yourself? Lets look again at your words: ==+== I reject that the sanctions are the (...) (23 years ago, 10-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: "The Propaganda War" from the Economist —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) I've given multiple cites. Who are you to question me this way? What informs your opinion of anything for that matter? Foamer. (...) No change of heart. (...) Still feel that way. (...) Still feel that way. (...) Let's review. It is possible (...) (23 years ago, 10-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: "The Propaganda War" from the Economist —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | an important PS... (...) impoverishment != 500,000 children starving. (...) So do I. *some impoverishment*, after all was the *point* of the sanctions. My beef with them is that they're not impoverishing the *right things* (his palaces and his (...) (23 years ago, 10-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: "The Propaganda War" from the Economist —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | (...) What does it mean in Iraq then? Not enough money do buy a DVD player? (...) That's right say I am anti-US, when I am infact pro-truth. I thought they were UN sanction anyhow? (...) Larry. I have said this before. There is less food in the (...) (23 years ago, 11-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Founding Fathers Anti-American? —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | (...) All, I read text linked below last night. When I did, I realised that it linked quite well with a number of themes we (as a group) have given time here. It is heavily laced with paranoia, but it is still an interesting perspective. Have a (...) (23 years ago, 17-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Put up - or shut up. —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | (...) Where? Show me the source which you have given that back this: "I reject that even if the sanctions actually *caused* the death of even 1 child" & "The sanctions do not prevent the flow of food into the country" (...) Scott Arthur. (...) The (...) (23 years ago, 11-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Put up - or shut up. —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | (...) What, no answer? (...) Well, have you seen the light? (...) (23 years ago, 12-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
