 | | Re: Violence created by presence of guns? (was: Gotta love Oracle...) —Frank Filz
|
| | | (...) While I don't have any knowledge of the laws of Canada and the UK, I'm pretty confident the rights enshrined in the US Constitution are not as well protected in Canada and the UK. (...) The right to bear arms is not the "almost single one (...) (23 years ago, 10-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Violence created by presence of guns? (was: Gotta love Oracle...) —Horst Lehner
|
| | | | (...) Not a single word of arms there. What do you read between the lines? (...) Maybe, but even with the arms you US civilians do have, do you think that is realistic? :wq Horst (23 years ago, 16-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Violence created by presence of guns? (was: Gotta love Oracle...) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | (...) It was, but sight of that point was lost and unconstitutional restrictions imposed on what sorts of arms can be owned have now made it less realistic. That's the whole POINT of this debate, after all. (23 years ago, 19-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Violence created by presence of guns? (was: Gotta love Oracle...) —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | (...) Yes. If a large chunk (say, 50%) of the US population used handguns and rifles to overthrow the national government for the sake of instilling a better one, I'm sure that we would defeat the military. They would not posess the will to put the (...) (23 years ago, 19-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
