To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 1339
1338  |  1340
Subject: 
Re: Rights to free goods? (was Re: What happened?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Fri, 2 Jul 1999 19:59:11 GMT
Viewed: 
1234 times
  
Frank Filz wrote in message <377A8667.334E@mindspring.com>...
Ed Jones wrote:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Frank Filz writes:
I think that in a perfect liberatopia, all three of these people would
have no problem getting the care they need, through charity.
So you are saying that these people have the right to the care that they • need.

No.


  No, he did not say that.  Its funny how people who like to take other
people's property also like to take other people's words and misuse them.

Isn't charity the giving of free goods?

Yes and no.


   Frank is catching on quick, but I do not see how the answer is yes and
no.  PLMK.  Anyway, I don't think the giving of free goods exist.  There are
goods (none of which are free because some one must produce them, always at
a cost).  Charity is the giving of goods - theft is the taking of goods.
Either given freely or taken by force, there is no other way goods can be
transferred.  Only one way is right, or just, or acceptable to a person
whose morals are not flawed.

Are you saying that these people have
a right to free goods?

No. There is no right to charity. A charity may feel a moral obligation
to help, but that moral obligation is something between them and their
benefactors. A charity will set conditions under which it provides goods
and services. Some charities will have less stringent conditions, others
will have more stringent conditions. The benefactors are free to chose
the charity whose conditions they agree with. In a free market,
charities will arise which serve the interests of the benefactors.

Our government is actually largely a charity, but unfortuanately we
don't get to decide how much to contribute, so there is no market to
guide the government into supporting those charitable services that the
people really want to support.

Libertarianism is being portrayed as a cold uncaring society. What I
read from Larry's posts is not a cold uncaring society. I see a society
which will make the best world for as many people as are willing to
participate to the best of their ability in that society. And yes, that
society will be cold and uncaring to certain people. So is our current
society (ask the various refugee groups who we haven't gone in and
stomped their oppressors for one example).


   That is one of the virtues of selfishness (thats a pun for any one who
missed it) - its more of a trait.  All of us who hold selfishness as a
virtue are seen as cold and uncaring, when that really is untrue.  I am
selfish (you have to love your self) and the higher society rises,
inevitably the higher I can.  Our current society is, in fact, much more
cold and uncaring than the libertopia these guys are wishing for.  If
society becomes a better place for the people at the top, it also becomes a
better place for those in between and at the bottom.  Just compare the
luxuries of wealth now to 100 years ago, and do the same for the
impoverished now and 100 years ago - all have escalated.  The gap may be
larger, but EVERYONE is better off now.  Of course life is what you make of
it, if you choose to make nothing of it, you will obtain your goal,
regardless of how well society manages.

--
Frank Filz

-----------------------------
Work: mailto:ffilz@us.ibm.com
Home: mailto:ffilz@mindspring.com

--
   Have fun!
   John
AUCTION Page
http://members.ebay.com/aboutme/ig88888888/
TRADE Page http://www114.pair.com/ig88/lego/index.htm
MOC,CA[cl,bf,cr,fm,bk+++ wp,dm,rk,df++ fk-]++++(6035)
SW,TR,old(456)+++ TO++ PI,SP+ DU-- #+++++
ig88888888@stlnet.com & IG88888888 on AOL



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Rights to free goods? (was Re: What happened?
 
John DiRienzo wrote in message ... (...) Are you commenting on my words or Ed's here? (...) My "yes and no" was that in one sense, charity is the giving of goods without expecting something in return (shorthand "free goods"), but it is also a "no" (...) (25 years ago, 3-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Rights to free goods? (was Re: What happened?
 
(...) No. (...) Yes and no. (...) No. There is no right to charity. A charity may feel a moral obligation to help, but that moral obligation is something between them and their benefactors. A charity will set conditions under which it provides goods (...) (25 years ago, 30-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

433 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR