Subject:
|
Re: Terrorist Attacks on America
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 12 Sep 2001 02:39:12 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3521 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dan Boger writes:
> Ross Crawford wrote:
> > And maybe there'll be a few million more innocent people killed before • everyone
> > suddenly realises it hasn't made any difference. Is terrorism OK when
> > sanctioned by GWB? You really think it will stop others retaliating?
>
> I don't coun't an attack on terrorists as terrorism.
Why not?
> can you really compare an attack on a terrorist training camp to an attack
on civilians?
Yes, I can. They're all people, even if they may be somewhat mis-guided.
Trouble is, Bush seems to be saying he wants to retaliate against anyone who
harbours terrorists. And how do they decide who are the terrorists and who's
helping them? Answer: They make an informed guess. They don't mind if they make
a few mistakes, thats just "collateral damage". But to the people targetted,
it's murdering innocent people, just like the WTC. And if the US can retaliate,
why shouldn't they?
> You are right though, retaliating won't stop terrorism, it would just make
it harder.
How do you figure that????
> That's a good thing though. But increased security can help prevent such
things from happening, and that's something even the pacificists can agree on.
Now you've changed the discussion to "increased security"? Where did that come
from? I didn't hear anything about that in Bush's speeches.
ROSCO
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
 | | Re: Terrorist Attacks on America
|
| (...) -snip- (...) make (...) retaliate, (...) Interesting questions and statements Ross. Today's events are certainly very, very tragic and saddening. The long term effects of these attacks could/will be devasting. I hope the U.S. first finds out (...) (23 years ago, 12-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | Re: Terrorist Attacks on America
|
| (...) When people fight wars they kill people. It's very sad, especially when you consider that most of these people don't consider themselves 'evil' but are convinced that they are right (it's possible that they were 'mis-guided' by their leaders). (...) (23 years ago, 12-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Terrorist Attacks on America
|
| (...) I don't coun't an attack on terrorists as terrorism. can you really compare an attack on a terrorist training camp to an attack on civilians? You are right though, retaliating won't stop terrorism, it would just make it harder. That's a good (...) (23 years ago, 12-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
133 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
