Subject:
|
Re: Terrorist Attacks on America
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 12 Sep 2001 02:13:16 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3511 times
|
| |
|
|
Ross Crawford wrote:
> And maybe there'll be a few million more innocent people killed before everyone
> suddenly realises it hasn't made any difference. Is terrorism OK when
> sanctioned by GWB? You really think it will stop others retaliating?
I don't coun't an attack on terrorists as terrorism. can you really compare an attack on a terrorist training camp to an attack on civilians? You are right though, retaliating won't stop terrorism, it would just make it harder. That's a good thing though. But increased security can help prevent such things from happening, and that's something even the pacificists can agree on.
:/
Dan
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Terrorist Attacks on America
|
| (...) everyone (...) Why not? (...) on civilians? Yes, I can. They're all people, even if they may be somewhat mis-guided. Trouble is, Bush seems to be saying he wants to retaliate against anyone who harbours terrorists. And how do they decide who (...) (23 years ago, 12-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
133 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
