Subject:
|
Re: Frivolous lawsuits--a new winner?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 31 Jul 2001 22:35:06 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
200 times
|
| |
|
|
> I may take some lumps for this, but...
>
> I think in that second case, the plaintiff is in the right--
> if the implication was that the prize was a car, then using
> trickery to get the motivational results pursuant to offering
> a car as a performance incentive is completely dishonest. The
IANAL, so what do I know, but I think you're right. It seems clear a car was
implied (especially since they took her to the parking lot to receive it).
> That said, I think the woman with the pop-tart is an idiot,
Sure, I agree here too, but I still think the "McDonald's hot coffee spilled
on lap" lawsuit still takes the cake.
Mark W
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Frivolous lawsuits--a new winner?
|
| (...) I think in that second case, the plaintiff is in the right-- if the implication was that the prize was a car, then using trickery to get the motivational results pursuant to offering a car as a performance incentive is completely dishonest. (...) (23 years ago, 31-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
