Subject:
|
Re: Shiri - A one time thing?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 27 Jul 2001 14:29:34 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
239 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Eric Joslin writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Paul Sinasohn writes:
> > I haven't seen any reasonable arguements other than 'that's how we voted to >> do it'.
> Then you simply haven't been reading. The reasons have been hashed over again
> and again. If you care what they are, feel free to look up several other
> threads where they have been stated.
I'll go further than that. (and yes, I am butting in too) If a membership of
a private organization votes to do things a certain way, that *in and of itself*
is reasonable, no matter *what* reasons they chose for voting that way.
Freedom to associate includes freedom not to associate, for whatever reason.
You're free to associate or not with that organization, as you choose. As
long as there are no legal barriers to entry for competing organizations,
with different policies, to form, you have no beef whatever, even if you
live locally. Which you and I don't.
++Lar
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Shiri - A one time thing?
|
| (...) Then you simply haven't been reading. The reasons have been hashed over again and again. If you care what they are, feel free to look up several other threads where they have been stated. (...) That's an illogical conclusion. (...) This is, (...) (23 years ago, 27-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
