To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 12041
12040  |  12042
Subject: 
Re: National vote on handguns?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Followup-To: 
lugnet.loc.pt
Date: 
Mon, 23 Jul 2001 21:34:45 GMT
Viewed: 
330 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Daniel Jassim writes:
It's too complicated to follow all the posts about handguns and automatic
weapons, so I'll throw the following idea into the wind. Since America IS a
democracy and every individual has an opinion on handguns and automatic
weapons, why not put it to a national vote? This IS the land of one man, one
vote after all (or one woman, one vote as well).

The right to bear arms, as described in our Constitution, was created at a
point in history when the only personal firearm was a muzzle loader (musket
or rather large pistol). Therefore, since times and technology have changed,
I say the right should remain but be narrowed to exclude handguns and
automatic weapons for the simple reason (and fact) of their common use in
thousands upon thousands of crimes, injuries and killings annually in our
country.

If it's such an important right and individual freedom in our country, all
registered American voters deserve the chance to decide their fate as
individuals and as a society. This is about people living and dying, often
needlessly, clinging to a believe that deserves serious reconsideration for
everyone's well being. I say put it to a national vote and let the people
decide, not the politicians and especially not the lobbyists. Let democracy
prevail on this matter, as it once did over 200 years ago.

Dan

If a non-US citizen is allowed a word in this matter, I'd point out the fact
that the United States seem to be the only "stable democracy" to have such a
liberal system for gun-control.
It is scary that the 3 nations, currently not at war, with the largest ratio
of violent crimes are the USA, South Africa, and Brazil. In all three you
can easily acquire guns, both legal and illegal.
In the opposite end, Europe: heavy restrictions on weaponry, and few violent
crimes carried out with legal weapons. Most important, a lower ratio of
violent crimes *at all*.
I agree with you that the present legal system in your country has a very
defined historic background. Which *has* changed (noone there is afraid
North Korea or Lybia will try an invasion...)
That is why american people pay taxes, and support an army. Or is it not?
Vote, for your own sake.

Pedro



Message is in Reply To:
  National vote on handguns?
 
It's too complicated to follow all the posts about handguns and automatic weapons, so I'll throw the following idea into the wind. Since America IS a democracy and every individual has an opinion on handguns and automatic weapons, why not put it to (...) (23 years ago, 21-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

110 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR