To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 12031
12030  |  12032
Subject: 
Re: National vote on handguns?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Mon, 23 Jul 2001 18:09:06 GMT
Viewed: 
644 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:

I happen to think that
referendums are a terrible idea at the national level, because I think a
more representative and less straight democratic government is better.

I think I disagree, though I'd invite anyone to convince me.  I think we • should
do away with all our laws, start over, and put everything up for straight
democratic vote.  And each and every law/issue would need 75% in favor in • order
to pass.  I'd bet good money that we'd end up with a preferable system.


This does not make 100% sense to me - getting rid of a lot of laws only to
referendum them back. Why not just Constitutional-ise referenda, and use
them to remove/add laws?

The reason that I think it makes sense is that if it took 75% of the people to
agree, most of them wouldn't be voted back in place.  We would have the obvious
victimizations illegal and some meta-organizational issues agreed to, and
that's about all.  Just the way it should be.

Chris



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: National vote on handguns?
 
(...) Actually, the reason it *doesn't* make sense is that you require a 75% consensus. In a group of just 12 people it's hard to get 75% agreement on what kind of pizza to get; do you honestly expect that *any* issue, when put before a vote by the (...) (23 years ago, 24-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: National vote on handguns?
 
(...) This does not make 100% sense to me - getting rid of a lot of laws only to referendum them back. Why not just Constitutional-ise referenda, and use them to remove/add laws? Scott A (...) (23 years ago, 23-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

110 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR