Subject:
|
Re: National vote on handguns?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 24 Jul 2001 13:21:08 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
566 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks writes:
> > This does not make 100% sense to me - getting rid of a lot of laws only to
> > referendum them back. Why not just Constitutional-ise referenda, and use
> > them to remove/add laws?
>
> The reason that I think it makes sense is that if it took 75% of the people to
> agree, most of them wouldn't be voted back in place.
Actually, the reason it *doesn't* make sense is that you require a 75%
consensus. In a group of just 12 people it's hard to get 75% agreement on
what kind of pizza to get; do you honestly expect that *any* issue, when put
before a vote by the entire US voting populace, will pass? That goes for
every law, from "don't steal soap from the motel" to "don't kill someone for
beating you at checkers."
> We would have the obvious victimizations illegal and some meta-organizational
> issues agreed to, and that's about all. Just the way it should be.
What exactly, under a 75% voting majority opinion, is an "obvious
victimization?" It seems that we can't establish agreement on
meta-organizational issues in the first place, and in any case, how would we
document such "agreement?" By a plurality? By the loudest voice?
Dave!
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: National vote on handguns?
|
| (...) to (...) Sure. I don't want to invest a lot in defense of this system that I created in four seconds while reading the note before, but I do actually think that part of it has merit. I'm sure that 75% of us would agree that stealing and (...) (23 years ago, 24-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: National vote on handguns?
|
| (...) should (...) order (...) The reason that I think it makes sense is that if it took 75% of the people to agree, most of them wouldn't be voted back in place. We would have the obvious victimizations illegal and some meta-organizational issues (...) (23 years ago, 23-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
110 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
