 | | Re: Handgun Death Rate —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | (...) This is an interesting point, but I think it can be avoided if it is a Federal test, not a state or other local test. Since the test should be done in conjunction with the training course, there shouldn't be a problem: if it ain't in the (...) (23 years ago, 20-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Handgun Death Rate —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | (...) I assume the resultant gun is then illegal? Scott A (...) (23 years ago, 20-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Handgun Death Rate —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | | | | (...) I forget - I think it's illegal. Or was (I noted a more up to date response on the laws a few messages back). Bruce (23 years ago, 20-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Handgun Death Rate —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | (...) Not at all, and this has never been so. (I would point that even if inferior 'laws' stated that, they would be negated by the constitution, but that's not really my point at this time.) (...) said. (...) See (URL) for the details. Chris (23 years ago, 20-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Handgun Death Rate —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | | (...) Fwoosh - that's way too much to wade through. I found another site that condensed it more to the essentials. 10 states prohibit the sale of fully-automatic weapons (machine-guns) entirely. The rest may or may not have some retrictions, and (...) (23 years ago, 20-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
