To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 11675
11674  |  11676
Subject: 
Re: More LP S P A M : (was Re: Scary Survey results about the US First Amendment)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Mon, 16 Jul 2001 12:09:06 GMT
Viewed: 
1062 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:

I am no expert either, but that is the usual criticism it endures in the UK.

This makes it sound like you're saying that adult movies are demeaning to women
because that's what the news in the UK prints.  What???

I disagree that adult cinema is geared towards "toward the satisfaction of
male sexual fantasy and desire". I imagine it is directed towards a
sub-group of male sexual fantasy and desire.

Well, I suppose each work is directed toward a specific demographic.  But what
I meant is that the movies are meant to appeal to the shared male sense of
eroticism rather than the shared female sense of eroticism.

Sex
education should, at the very least, be in the context some sort of well
formed mutual relationship

What exactly does 'well formed' mean?  I'm thinking you mean, that they know
each other well..?  Would you assert that it would be somehow improper for me
to drive to New York City (about an hour away) to visit a sex club where I
would meet and copulate with strangers?

Sodom and Gomorrah!

Scott, I think this is a great example of why your posts bug people.  Were you
suggesting a club in NYC for me to try?  Were you suggesting that NYC is going
to suffer a divine fire storm and I should stay away?  This statement is
totally unclear to me.  And in any of the meanings that I can guess at, it
doesn't seem to bear at all on the point that I don't know what you meant by a
well formed relationship.

Chris



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: More LP S P A M : (was Re: Scary Survey results about the US First Amendment)
 
(...) Who mentioned "printed news". Porn seldom makes the news in the UK... not in the paper I read at any rate. I was think more of educated debate. (...) It was a jest. My religious views are my own, I am not about to inflict them on anyone. Scott (...) (23 years ago, 16-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: More LP S P A M : (was Re: Scary Survey results about the US First Amendment)
 
(...) I am no expert either, but that is the usual criticism it endures in the UK. I disagree that adult cinema is geared towards "toward the satisfaction of male sexual fantasy and desire". I imagine it is directed towards a sub-group of male (...) (23 years ago, 13-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

189 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR