Subject:
|
Re: More LP S P A M : (was Re: Scary Survey results about the US First Amendment)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 16 Jul 2001 13:08:54 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1186 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
>
> > I am no expert either, but that is the usual criticism it endures in the UK.
>
> This makes it sound like you're saying that adult movies are demeaning to women
> because that's what the news in the UK prints. What???
Who mentioned "printed news". Porn seldom makes the news in the UK... not in
the paper I read at any rate. I was think more of educated debate.
>
> > I disagree that adult cinema is geared towards "toward the satisfaction of
> > male sexual fantasy and desire". I imagine it is directed towards a
> > sub-group of male sexual fantasy and desire.
>
> Well, I suppose each work is directed toward a specific demographic. But what
> I meant is that the movies are meant to appeal to the shared male sense of
> eroticism rather than the shared female sense of eroticism.
>
> > > > Sex
> > > > education should, at the very least, be in the context some sort of well
> > > > formed mutual relationship
> > >
> > > What exactly does 'well formed' mean? I'm thinking you mean, that they know
> > > each other well..? Would you assert that it would be somehow improper for me
> > > to drive to New York City (about an hour away) to visit a sex club where I
> > > would meet and copulate with strangers?
> >
> > Sodom and Gomorrah!
>
> Scott, I think this is a great example of why your posts bug people. Were you
> suggesting a club in NYC for me to try? Were you suggesting that NYC is going
> to suffer a divine fire storm and I should stay away? This statement is
> totally unclear to me. And in any of the meanings that I can guess at, it
> doesn't seem to bear at all on the point that I don't know what you meant by a
> well formed relationship.
It was a jest. My religious views are my own, I am not about to inflict them
on anyone.
Scott A
>
> Chris
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
189 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
