Subject:
|
Re: What is spam? (was Re: Scary Survey results about the US First Amendment
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 13 Jul 2001 08:11:00 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
938 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Tom Stangl writes:
>
>
> Christopher Weeks wrote:
>
> > > their condition. I recognised your rights based outlook on this, but I think
> > > a mature democracy should be able to make a decisions and ban such material.
> >
> > And as always, I'm frightened of your 'mature democracy.' An unfettered
> > democracy is potentially as bad as any dictatorship. Heck, with a dictatorship
> > at least you have some chance of a cluefull guy at the top.
>
> Not to mention that a dictatorship is often more easily changed than a democracy -
> you only generally have to get rid of one person (and maybe some key henchmen).
Oh, you mean like Jiang Zemin or perhaps Augusto Pinochet?
:)
Scott A
>
>
> > > > Maybe. If there is no victim, there is no crime.
> > >
> > > Flatulence has many victims, but it is not a crime. If there is no law,
> > > there is no crime. :)
> >
> > Good point! Let's do away with most of them. :-)
>
> It certainly would free up a lot of money wasted on jails and the court system
> (could free it up for legitimate crimes or prevention, if not for non-judicial
> uses).
>
>
> --
> Tom Stangl
> ***http://www.vfaq.com/
> ***DSM Visual FAQ home
> ***http://ba.dsm.org/
> ***SF Bay Area DSMs
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
189 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
