Subject:
|
Re: More LP S P A M : (was Re: Scary Survey results about the US First Amendment)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 10 Jul 2001 17:37:30 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
895 times
|
| |
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Duane Hess writes:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Are you advocating limits on speech rights? If you
> > > > > > > > don't want your kids exposed to porn and violence - monitor what they are
> > > > > > > > watching.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > What if a kid has a parent that does not care - is that OK? What if the
> > > > > > > violence/porn is exploitative - is that OK?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > That's the parent's duty - not mine, or the governments for that matter
> > > > > > either.
> > > > >
> > > > > So you would rather that kid was corrupted, than some sort of age check
> > > > > system was used?
> > > >
> > > > Are you sure that the child will be corrupted? I would rather that the child
> > > > be exposed to the realities of life so that it can form its own opinion on
> > > > what is right/wrong.
> > >
> > > "realities of life"? You think violence in movies and pornography represent
> > > the "realities of life"? It looks like my life is duller than I thought.
> >
> >
> > Then I'm assuming that you've never had sex, or been in a fist-fight.
>
> Why?
Pornography is just a graphical depiction of sex. Sex happens in real life.
Violence happens in real life to varying degrees. Get threatened with a
crow-bar, or get maced sometime. I feel that both are pretty violent and
they have both happened to me.
>
> Scott A
>
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
189 Messages in This Thread: (Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|