 | | Re: Lobster Bisque (was: Did animals have rights before we invented rights?) —Frank Filz
|
| | | (...) Hmm, since we've been playing with taking interpretations to extremes to see how they work out, a technique which I wholeheartedly endorse... - Can you justify your ownership of anything metal? The metal was "found". - Can you justify your (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Ownership (was: Lobster Bisque (was: Did animals have rights before we invented rights?)) —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | | (...) I've been having a crisis of faith over the past several months and tried to bring it up unsuccessfully once before, but this ties into it. To get to the point, I'm having trouble justifying ownership. The entire notion of ownership actually. (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Ownership —Daniel Jassim
|
| | | | | | (...) Really? I just thought it was just an extension of man's territorial nature (maybe no different than dogs pissing on trees to mark territory). (...) Yeah, at what point can it be called exploitation? I think there is such thing as collective (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Lobster Bisque (was: Did animals have rights before we invented rights?) —Daniel Jassim
|
| | | | Frank: Try envisioning the greater ethic behind my statement about ownership and maybe you'll appreciate it more. I think by picking it apart and making it overly technical, you've missed the greater lesson. If you want to disagree with the notion (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
