Debate : 11337


Off-Topic / Debate / 11337	11336 \| 11338

Subject:	Re: Did animals have rights before we invented rights?
Newsgroups:	lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date:	Tue, 3 Jul 2001 11:43:46 GMT
Viewed:	1086 times

In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes: > > If you mean you avoid the point(1), and I don't - I agree. > > (1) Like you did here with ROSCO's 3 questions: > http://news.lugnet.com/off-topic/debate/?n=11325 Hi Scott, I don't see this as a case of avoiding the point. I don't see any point in Lar (or anyone) rushing to answer these questions - I don't feel they have any real answer, they're kinda rhetorical, intended to get people to think about where rights actually come from. Of course if someone *does* want to try & answer them, be my guest! ROSCO

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: Did animals have rights before we invented rights?
(...) OK, they were your points - I stand corrected. BTW : the questions you posed did remind me of an American stereotype we often see here. What I mean are those who say that they have "god given" rights. I always think that, in an agnostic (...) (23 years ago, 3-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: Did animals have rights before we invented rights?
(...) If you mean you avoid the point(1), and I don't - I agree. (...) This sounds almost threatening. You must be pretty thin skinned Larry. Do you keep a little black book of all of those who "no longer have standing" with you, or do you use (...) (23 years ago, 3-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

244 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search