Subject:
|
Re: Did animals have rights before we invented rights?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 3 Jul 2001 12:02:44 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1126 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Ross Crawford writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> >
> > If you mean you avoid the point(1), and I don't - I agree.
> >
> > (1) Like you did here with ROSCO's 3 questions:
> > http://news.lugnet.com/off-topic/debate/?n=11325
>
> Hi Scott,
>
> I don't see this as a case of avoiding the point. I don't see any point in Lar
> (or anyone) rushing to answer these questions - I don't feel they have any real
> answer, they're kinda rhetorical, intended to get people to think about where
> rights actually come from.
>
> Of course if someone *does* want to try & answer them, be my guest!
>
> ROSCO
OK, they were your points - I stand corrected.
BTW : the questions you posed did remind me of an American stereotype we
often see here. What I mean are those who say that they have "god given"
rights. I always think that, in an agnostic culture, by saying they have a
"god given" right to do anything they simply are saying that they are
unwilling to justify themselves or their situation.
Scott A
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
244 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
