To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 11362
11361  |  11363
Subject: 
Re: Did animals have rights before we invented rights?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Wed, 4 Jul 2001 02:07:11 GMT
Viewed: 
1068 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:

BTW : the questions you posed did remind me of an American stereotype we
often see here. What I mean are those who say that they have "god given"
rights. I always think that, in an agnostic culture, by saying they have a
"god given" right to do anything they simply are saying that they are
unwilling to justify themselves or their situation.

Well, I'm an athiest, so I just internally translate anything to do with God
into a similar sentence something like "my belief". So god-given rights
would become something like "the rights I believe in" (roughly speaking). I
think athiests also try to justify themselves, they just don't (generally)
use God in the justification.

ROSCO

PS: I don't believe in agnostics, either, but that's a thread for another day...



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Did animals have rights before we invented rights?
 
(...) OK, they were your points - I stand corrected. BTW : the questions you posed did remind me of an American stereotype we often see here. What I mean are those who say that they have "god given" rights. I always think that, in an agnostic (...) (23 years ago, 3-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

244 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR