 | | Re: Child rearing (was: Nothing personal, but...) —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | (...) Why is there a limit? What is it? What is it based on? You go on to say some pretty commonly accepted stuff, but I'm not infering what this limit is. (And simply by being popular, doesn't make it right.) (...) It sounds like you think I'm (...) (23 years ago, 22-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Child rearing (was: Nothing personal, but...) —Frank Filz
|
| | | | | (...) I do agree that as much as possible the "punishment" (consequences) should be related to the "crime". The consequences for mouthing off could result in no TV for the day if the consequence is actually "since you refuse to be civil today, you (...) (23 years ago, 22-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Suddenly Chris makes it personal (was: Nothing personal, but...) —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | (...) You're creating a false dichotomy; by forcing Shiri to assert a hard line of distinction--knowing that such a hard line is by its nature impossible--you are attempting to say that no distinction can exist between "too much," "too little," and (...) (23 years ago, 22-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Suddenly Chris makes it personal (was: Nothing personal, but...) —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | | | (...) (And (...) I can see what you're saying, but that wasn't my intent. I would be satisfied to discuss the results of her (or your) attempt to codify (even with the understanding that the edges are hazy) what "too much," "too little," and (...) (23 years ago, 22-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Suddenly Chris makes it personal (was: Nothing personal, but...) —Tom Stangl
|
| | | | | | (...) And in the meantime everyone ELSE has to put up with your child being a brat? You disgust me. You're one of the people that lets their children run rampant over everyone else, letting them "learn", and then "discuss" it with them afterwards. (...) (23 years ago, 23-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Suddenly Chris makes it personal (was: Nothing personal, but...) —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | | | (...) to (...) time. (...) If he had been so severe that I thought the other children needed their rights protected, I would have done so. In the instance that I'm thinking of, that wasn't the case. He wasn't bein egregiously abusive, he just wasn't (...) (23 years ago, 23-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Child rearing (was: Nothing personal, but...) —Shiri Dori
|
| | | | (...) Heehee - for a second there I thought you were saying that just coz *I* was popular doesn't mean I'm right. ROFL! OK, let me give a few examples, since it *is* a grey area, as Dave correctly pointed out (and you seemed to agree). I'm claiming (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Child rearing (was: Nothing personal, but...) —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | Thanks for the response Shiri, I was begining to worry that my poor behavior had actually run everyone off from the topic. That, I think, would be an embarrassing first. I'll be disagreeing more politely now. :-) (...) In as much as you are (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Child rearing (was: Nothing personal, but...) —Shiri Dori
|
| | | | (...) Hehe. Good. I like you better this way! (From your .debate posts I barely recognize the funny guy I met at Brickfest last year! It took me awhile to convince myself I was not mistaken and it was the same person. You're usually so serious (...) (23 years ago, 26-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
