Subject:
|
Re: Libertarian SPAM (Propaganda)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 18 Jun 2001 08:29:53 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1241 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd writes:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd writes:
> >
> > > > And long term detriments may not be visible to all the Libertarian Party
> > > > members. I did give a specific example (Libertarians allowing business to
> > > > discriminate on the basis of race, creed, and sex)
> > >
> > > Might have missed the conclusion of that thread if it was in a different
> > > thread but haven't seen a demonstration of how this is actually detrimental
> > > (to anyone other than the business owner foolish enough to do it) yet.
> >
> > Four messages back from the one I'm typing now.
> >
> > You haven't seen a demonstration of how this is detrimental?!? Did you miss
> > the reasons for the civil rights movement? Ensuing riots in reaction to
> > racism? I pointed out earlier that you get that kind of thing from
> > disenfranchisement of vast segments from society. You get it even now -
> > make the forces against it weaker and you'll get it more. Idunno - I find
> > that terribly detrimental.
>
> Oh, me too. I just don't see it as following from allowing (not requiring)
> businesses (with no barriers to entry) to choose who to serve. Jim Crow laws
> REQUIRED businesses to discriminate.
So where would that outlook stand on this story:
http://web.tallahasseedemocrat.com/content/tallahassee/2001/05/31/local/0531.loc.perry.htm
>
> ++Lar
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Libertarian SPAM (Propaganda)
|
| You ought to wait 2-3 days, at least, before bumping... (...) discriminate at all. Not enough facts in the story to judge what is going on in this particular case. Not an important enough case, really, to justify my trying to research it further to (...) (23 years ago, 19-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Libertarian SPAM (Propaganda)
|
| (...) Oh, me too. I just don't see it as following from allowing (not requiring) businesses (with no barriers to entry) to choose who to serve. Jim Crow laws REQUIRED businesses to discriminate. ++Lar (23 years ago, 15-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
271 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
