To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 11007
11006  |  11008
Subject: 
Re: Sanctions (was: Libertarian Propaganda)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Sun, 17 Jun 2001 18:39:59 GMT
Viewed: 
1203 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:

On the attack again, Daniel?

I haven't attacked anyone, Larry. Telling someone to "mind their tone" is
hardly an attack. And I didn't call Tom's notions or opinion ridiculous or
any other thing. If you want to play games and jump and nitpick what I say,
twist it to mean something else, that's your loss. You choose to interpret
my posts in a negative way because of your negative bias toward me. If the
same words came from Frank Filz or Christopher Weeks or anyone else, I'm
sure your response (if any) would be favorable.

Calling something a ridiculous notion is hardly
an insult, it's just a characterization of the notion itself. The very idea
that someone might find fault with something you say gets to you, doesn't
it? Here I thought we'd gotten you relatively calmed down again. Oh well.

Who is "we"? In my opinion, you act this way because you can, hiding behind
your computer and living some sort of fantasy. That's fine, but I'm not
rolling over and becoming a part of this little on-line club you seem to be
trying to create. You and me have views which we mostly agree on, perhaps
for different reasons, and a few views here and there that we disagree on.
As far as finding fault in what I say, I am happy to listen. But there were
so many ways that Tom could have asked the same thing, he chose a caustic
approach and I'm not impressed. If you want to help, let Tom speak for
himself and let us work this out. Stop looking for opportunities to kick the
sand in my face.

Dan



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Sanctions (was: Libertarian Propaganda)
 
(...) Sorry for butting in, then, because I can see that you and he are doing *so well* at dealing with the actual assertions and issues... I don't know what I was thinking suggesting that you might be wrong about something or that you might be (...) (23 years ago, 17-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Sanctions (was: Libertarian Propaganda)
 
(...) On the attack again, Daniel? Calling something a ridiculous notion is hardly an insult, it's just a characterization of the notion itself. The very idea that someone might find fault with something you say gets to you, doesn't it? Here I (...) (23 years ago, 17-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

271 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR