To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 10911
10910  |  10912
Subject: 
Re: Libertarian SPAM (Propaganda)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Fri, 15 Jun 2001 16:29:15 GMT
Viewed: 
1103 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:

I think, stated that way, it's a fair enough (but not particularly
important) question. I don't know "the answer" but I advanced my theory already.

  I accept that you don't think it's important, and I accept also your
assertion that you would be willing to have society "start from scratch"
(ie: with everyone truly equal) if it meant that Libertopia could be realized.

http://news.lugnet.com/off-topic/debate/?n=10417

  In that way, you concretely separate yourself from the general perception
of the LP, so your views shouldn't necessarily be lumped in with those of
the party at large.
  However, the question of demographic skewing *is* important to the LP
unless its members wish to preserve its status as a non-contender in the
national arena.  Whether or not anything inherent in the party estranges
non-white-males, the perception of the LP is that it does estrange
non-white-males.  Perception, in politics like so much else, is much more
persuasive than assertions of "wait and see and it'll all work out."

To wit: Long term benefit to society may not always be visible to all members.

  Lacking any solid evidence to support it, this assertion is rhetorically
identical to the doctrine that God allows us to suffer because He loves us,
but we can't see the whole picture.

     Dave!



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Libertarian SPAM (Propaganda)
 
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler writes: <concern for long term viability under demographic skewing> Fair enough. However the long term viability of the LP as a party isn't that important to me, per se. While I am quite ready to throw (...) (23 years ago, 15-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Libertarian SPAM (Propaganda)
 
(...) Southern Christian Leadership Conference. Pivotal in the anti segregation movement. (...) I think, stated that way, it's a fair enough (but not particularly important) question. I don't know "the answer" but I advanced my theory already. To (...) (23 years ago, 15-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

271 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR