Subject:
|
Re: Libertarian SPAM (Propaganda)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 15 Jun 2001 16:13:02 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1075 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd writes:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
>
> > > Was the message of the SCLC less valid because SCLC members were mostly
> > > black?
>
> Southern Christian Leadership Conference. Pivotal in the anti segregation
> movement.
I doubt they have LP support!
>
> > I'm not looking
> > to make a put down of the Libertarian Party - I honestly think this is
> > something that Libertarians need to consider more: if they are touting their
> > message as so universal, why is such a narrow audience that is listening?
>
> I think, stated that way, it's a fair enough (but not particularly
> important) question. I don't know "the answer" but I advanced my theory already.
>
> To wit: Long term benefit to society may not always be visible to all members.
>
> ADM will be a much better company in the long term if it were weaned from ag
> subsidy but you may not get them to agree, and they have pretty well paid
> lobbyists who lobby for the status quo.
>
> People currently on welfare will be a lot better off in the long term if
> they were better educated and had skills commesurate with the needs of the
> job marketplace and had motivation to use those skills, but you may not be
> able to get Al Sharpton to agree.
What are you saying? Are you saying those "People currently on welfare" are
the ones not joining the LP? i.e. "People currently on welfare" are all but
white males?
Scott A
>
> And so on and so forth.
>
> ++Lar
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Libertarian SPAM (Propaganda)
|
| (...) Doubt away, Thomas. You'd be wrong, though, if you thought that the LP was in favor of government mandated segregation. (...) Just giving off the cuff examples of some classes of people or organizations that might benefit from change but are (...) (23 years ago, 15-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | Re: Libertarian SPAM (Propaganda)
|
| (...) Scott, Some of your inferences are going beyond asinine. I'll stop there, because all I'll do is give you the satisfaction of getting a rise out of someone, which is all you seem to want to do here. If you have a middle name, you should change (...) (23 years ago, 15-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Libertarian SPAM (Propaganda)
|
| (...) Southern Christian Leadership Conference. Pivotal in the anti segregation movement. (...) I think, stated that way, it's a fair enough (but not particularly important) question. I don't know "the answer" but I advanced my theory already. To (...) (23 years ago, 15-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
271 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
