Subject:
|
Re: Libertarian SPAM (Propaganda)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 15 Jun 2001 17:33:26 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1068 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd writes:
> > > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> >
> > > > Was the message of the SCLC less valid because SCLC members were mostly
> > > > black?
> >
> > Southern Christian Leadership Conference. Pivotal in the anti segregation
> > movement.
>
> I doubt they have LP support!
Doubt away, Thomas. You'd be wrong, though, if you thought that the LP was
in favor of government mandated segregation.
> What are you saying? Are you saying those "People currently on welfare" are
> the ones not joining the LP? i.e. "People currently on welfare" are all but
> white males?
Just giving off the cuff examples of some classes of people or organizations
that might benefit from change but are unwilling to do the analysis and
embrace it. Not meant to be an exhaustive list
> > And so on and so forth.
What did you think this phrase meant?
++Lar
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Libertarian SPAM (Propaganda)
|
| (...) I doubt they have LP support! (...) What are you saying? Are you saying those "People currently on welfare" are the ones not joining the LP? i.e. "People currently on welfare" are all but white males? Scott A (...) (23 years ago, 15-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
271 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
