Subject:
|
Re: Libertarian SPAM (Propaganda)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 15 Jun 2001 08:25:41 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1049 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
>
> > Ok, what is SCLC or AIM?
>
> American groups working for political or social change. What exactly they
> were advocating isn't important to my point.
I would like to be the judge of that.
>
> > How do you know that we are more white - you only assume (as I do).
>
> No, I count noses in fest pictures.
Hmm. So you are keeping a count? What sort of a person would do that? It is
not a thing I worry about.
> It may be an invalid inference from that
> to the makeup of lugnet as a whole but it's more than a mere assumption.
Not much more. I have been to 1 fest. I think the makeup was ~10-20%
scottish, and remainder were all English I think. I am pretty sure this is
not true for the whole of Lugnet?
> > That is not really the question (LUGNET does not attempt to represent the
> > views of society). The question is : Why is the LP so "white"?
>
> No.
Yes. Why does the LP only attract white males? Why is that?
> The question is why does it matter? Demonstrate that the ethnic, racial,
> religious etc.
We shall move on to the religious make-up later. :-)
> makeup of a group has actual bearing on the validity of ideas
> the group espouses first, please.
I suppose it depends on what the LP is about. If it is a bunch of
businessmen making a living out of your subscription fee then it does not
really matter. If it is an organisation which seeks to fundamentally change
the way the whole of society lives then I think its composition does matter.
Which is it?
Scott A
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Libertarian SPAM (Propaganda)
|
| (...) I *don't care* what the makeup of LUGNET or the hobby is. I never said I did. I just said it wasn't the same as the overall population. When you challenged me I went off and counted noses at that point in order to see if my hunch was right. It (...) (23 years ago, 15-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Libertarian SPAM (Propaganda)
|
| (...) American groups working for political or social change. What exactly they were advocating isn't important to my point. (...) No, I count noses in fest pictures. It may be an invalid inference from that to the makeup of lugnet as a whole but (...) (23 years ago, 14-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
271 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
