 | | Re: Libertarian Propaganda
|
|
(...) <snip> (...) Well, yes and no. While it may be easier to project power now than then, it was already easier in 1914, and I would argue that entangling alliances made WW I flare up worse and faster than if it had been just Austro Hungary (...) (23 years ago, 13-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Libertarian Propaganda
|
|
(...) The meaning of alliance in 1914 was already different than that in the 1780s. The point in 1914 that caused the war was very simply and plainly--as several recent studies and unearthed documents have confirmed--that the German leadership (...) (23 years ago, 13-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Libertarian Propaganda
|
|
(...) It's the COBOL equivalent (minus the nuances about pre/post incrementation) to ++Lar (increment Lar by 1 in C++) Try this then... 10 SET L = L + 1 (23 years ago, 13-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Libertarian Propaganda
|
|
(...) I thought the BASIC syntax was 10 LET L = L + 1 ???? ROSCO (23 years ago, 13-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Libertarian Propaganda
|
|
(...) Heh. That reminds me of my favorite footnote... In the introduction to Struggle for Mastery in Europe, AJP Taylor says something about European diplomats of the time being generally honest. Then in the footnote, he says something like, "It is (...) (23 years ago, 14-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Libertarian Propaganda
|
|
(...) Who said it was BASIC? :-) ++Lar (23 years ago, 14-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Libertarian Propaganda
|
|
(...) Yeah, it could be: LAR @ 1 + ? Jason J Railton (23 years ago, 14-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Libertarian Propaganda
|
|
(...) Argh! Can't even get that right. LAR @ 1 + . Jason J Railton (23 years ago, 14-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
