Subject:
|
Re: Libertarian Propaganda
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.fun
|
Date:
|
Wed, 13 Jun 2001 23:38:06 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
667 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Lindsay Frederick Braun writes:
> > Lar:
> > > Dave:
> > > > Lar:
>
> > > > > ++Lar
> > > >
> > > > As an aside, if I address or refer to you within a paragraph, should I
> > > > call you Lar, ++Lar, or Larry?
> > >
> > > The increment is an operator, a preface for the sig, not part of the
> > > identifier/name. (it's really just an old gag on Todd signing his name
> > > --Todd that stuck....) Should I be reciprocally leaving off the bang then too?
> > >
> > > ADD 1 to LAR. (is that better?? :-) )
> >
> > "Lar-One?" You sound like you should be on a 70s SF show. ;)
>
> It's the COBOL equivalent (minus the nuances about pre/post incrementation)
> to ++Lar (increment Lar by 1 in C++)
>
> Try this then...
>
> 10 SET L = L + 1
I thought the BASIC syntax was
10 LET L = L + 1
????
ROSCO
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
271 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
