| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Lindsay Frederick Braun writes:
> Lar:
> > Dave:
> > > Lar:
> > > > ++Lar
> > >
> > > As an aside, if I address or refer to you within a paragraph, should I
> > > call you Lar, ++Lar, or Larry?
> >
> > The increment is an operator, a preface for the sig, not part of the
> > identifier/name. (it's really just an old gag on Todd signing his name
> > --Todd that stuck....) Should I be reciprocally leaving off the bang then too?
> >
> > ADD 1 to LAR. (is that better?? :-) )
>
> "Lar-One?" You sound like you should be on a 70s SF show. ;)
It's the COBOL equivalent (minus the nuances about pre/post incrementation)
to ++Lar (increment Lar by 1 in C++)
Try this then...
10 SET L = L + 1
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Libertarian Propaganda
|
| (...) The meaning of alliance in 1914 was already different than that in the 1780s. The point in 1914 that caused the war was very simply and plainly--as several recent studies and unearthed documents have confirmed--that the German leadership (...) (23 years ago, 13-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
271 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
