Subject:
|
Re: Why the founding fathers limited government scope (was Re: Rolling Blackouts
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Sat, 12 May 2001 17:01:27 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2482 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Tom Stangl writes:
> > Daniel Jassim wrote:
> > Well, I'm just taking the common sense angle that the upper atmosphere is
> > generally an undisturbed area of the earth. Sure, the occassional meteor or
> > magnetic storm may come along but for the most part that region is left
> > alone.
>
> Daniel, I think you need to do a bit more research before you state the above.
> The upper atmosphere "generally undisturbed"? "Occasional meteor"? Think AGAIN.
> Combustion of a liquid-fueled rocket (solid fueled are rarely used "that high")
> at that level gives H2O as exhaust. You think water is bad for the atmosphere?
Seems like you already did the research, so please enlighten us. As I said,
we should approach the matter with caution. Yes, we should research the
matter so we don't end up doing more damage to our atmosphere. You got a
problem with that?
Dan
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
246 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
