Subject:
|
Re: Why the founding fathers limited government scope (was Re: Rolling Blackouts
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Sat, 12 May 2001 08:42:23 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2524 times
|
| |
|
|
Daniel Jassim wrote:
> I>Can't say that I've heard it causes any appreciable damage (the number of
> > launches is miniscule).
>
> Well, I'm just taking the common sense angle that the upper atmosphere is
> generally an undisturbed area of the earth. Sure, the occassional meteor or
> magnetic storm may come along but for the most part that region is left
> alone.
Daniel, I think you need to do a bit more research before you state the above.
The upper atmosphere "generally undisturbed"? "Occasional meteor"? Think AGAIN.
> So, who knows what sort of problems may be created by increasing
> launches? We know the ozone layer is already fragile, what effect does the
> combustion of a rocket have as it travels through this layer? So, I'd
> approach the matter with caution.
Combustion of a liquid-fueled rocket (solid fueled are rarely used "that high")
at that level gives H2O as exhaust. You think water is bad for the atmosphere?
--
Tom Stangl
***http://www.vfaq.com/
***DSM Visual FAQ home
***http://ba.dsm.org/
***SF Bay Area DSMs
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
246 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
