 | | Re: MichLUG Items in Debate not Appropriate
|
|
(...) Then why reply to them? (...) -no, what I am _not_ in favor of is having a non religious group become religious because of a minority opinion. I said, (...) (from .debate 10087) (...) What I wrote (I'm not sure you read it was: (...) -please (...) (24 years ago, 2-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.org.us.michlug)
|
| |
| | Re: MichLUG Items in Debate not Appropriate
|
|
To All, Well, since I am a laughing stock to the community now, I guess I will respond. (...) Because it was a MichLUG item, that's why, and it got dragged here. < Snipped rest of post > yes, I see. Well, after talking with Larry, and seeing some of (...) (24 years ago, 2-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.org.us.michlug)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: MichLUG Items in Debate not Appropriate
|
|
To all, I don’t think Scott needs to apologize for anything. If the local food store (Meijer in my case) would give food to the Catholic Church to feed poor people. Would that mean Meijer is endorsing the Catholic Church? What it means is that (...) (24 years ago, 2-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.org.us.michlug)
|
| |
| | Re: MichLUG Items in Debate not Appropriate
|
|
For what it's worth, here's my opinion on this: 1. I don't have a problem with flying the MichLUG banner at the event. I don't have a problem with not flying the MichLUG banner. What I have a problem with is the tone of this debate and the fact that (...) (24 years ago, 3-May-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
|
| |
| | Re: MichLUG Items in Debate not Appropriate
|
|
I thank you Peter for still wanting to participate. This is a dumb issue to debate over. Personally I have said many times I don’t care if the Michlug “logo” is used or not. Like I said I just need a lot of people to set up a big display. This all (...) (24 years ago, 3-May-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
|
