To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 10101
10100  |  10102
Subject: 
Re: A question of remembrance...
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Tue, 1 May 2001 14:52:50 GMT
Viewed: 
592 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Richard Marchetti writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
Turkey and Israel are "free to take care of it". However,  both have a
history of ignoring human rights and murdering civilians in the process.

That's the way of blood feuds.  Or gang-warfare.  Or <your phrase of choice
here>!

Still, a less polemical tone might be more appropriate for someone in Great
Britian.  Britain is hardly a country without fault, historically speaking.
If the sun never set on the British empire, believe me -- it's control was
built upon atrocities with a human cost.  Don't get me started...

That was in the bad old days... most other countries were doing pretty much
the same - or wanted to. But sure, I'm still not proud of it. Anyhow, we
have rebranded ourselves as the "UK" :-)

   Heh.  It may be sobering to point out that the "brand" of
   UK was born in 1800, following the forced Act of Union with
   Ireland.  That's when the name becomes valid, and it starts
   a new era of incredible colonial bloodshed.

   But I'm not sure all of that is entirely past--it may only
   seem so because Britain's power has waned so much.  But the
   capital benefits gained from those atrocities has remained;
   just walk around the West End of London and gaze up at the
   Georgian, Victorian, and Edwardian buildings and monuments.

   Speaking of senseless violence, I wonder what the protesters
   have gotten up to today...?

   best

   LFB



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: A question of remembrance...
 
(...) Indeed. But is was not until more recently untail it came into common usage. Most of the the world still refers to the UK as Britain, or more annoyingly England. (...) I do not doubt what you are saying. However, I have to say that the same (...) (23 years ago, 2-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: A question of remembrance...
 
(...) That was in the bad old days... most other countries were doing pretty much the same - or wanted to. But sure, I'm still not proud of it. Anyhow, we have rebranded ourselves as the "UK" :-) (...) I view some laws as protection for the poor or (...) (23 years ago, 27-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

197 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR