|
|
 | | Re: Common ground in science/Bible debate
|
| (...) I would disagree with this. There are basically a handfull of major world religions (Hinduism, Buddhism, Confucianism, Taoism, Judaism, Christianity and Islam - and some of these are sometimes considered more philosophies than religions). (...) (24 years ago, 7-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | A washed-out Robert (Was: Robert gets to invalidate logic)
|
| (...) Wow, cool, thanks Brother Lar. Keep the flattery up, you might make a Larritarian out of me yet! ;-) I'm noticing (and I'm sure it's been observed before) that these kind of noisemakers come in cycles, but only last a short time. Burn brightly (...) (24 years ago, 7-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Robert gets to invalidate logic (was Re: Science and beliefs (was Re: Alien races))
|
| (...) So why you just don't cut your holly book into two slices, and put your intellect between them and shove it all together to your holly hole, instead just losing your holly time here? If you want to debate, than debate till the end, if you (...) (24 years ago, 7-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Robert gets to invalidate logic (was Re: Science and beliefs (was Re: Alien races))
|
| (...) Even awake for that matter, I suspect, as comprehending gibberish that has no underlying meaning is a bit beyond Sproat's prowess. I've got one of those gibberish generators too, though, so producing text that is incomprehensible isn't much of (...) (24 years ago, 7-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Robert gets to invalidate logic (was Re: Science and beliefs (was Re: Alien races))
|
| (...) Heh..heh..heheheh.he...e...heheh. Selçuk (...) (24 years ago, 7-Apr-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
|
