 | | Re: Quick Poll - Kyoto
|
|
(...) Simpler. Kyoto is a bad idea. The one who wasn't brave was Clinton for not saying so. And I'll happily take my lumps from greens for that view. (...) (24 years ago, 29-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Quick Poll - Kyoto
|
|
Quick Poll - Kyoto What is the feeling in the US/elsewhere regarding W's back tracking on Kyoto? The line taken by the "green" lobby in the UK is that he is not brave enough to shoulder the economics of the situation. Is it as simple as that? A UK (...) (24 years ago, 29-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Does God have a name for God? (was: 20 Years of TLC's Frustration with "LEGOS")
|
|
(...) Who knows?? But God (if it exists) probably has another "entity" that it looks up to, and chances are it's not called "God". Of course, this assumes that "looks" and "up" actually have some kind of meaning in God's environment... ROSCO (24 years ago, 29-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Keeping things in perspective
|
|
(...) Ahhh, but then they would also have to change their building style. ; ) Robert (24 years ago, 28-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Looking for feedback.
|
|
(...) That might be how we wind up handling it. I think he's been hoping for more tangible resolution, but what can you do? (...) "Let cooler heads prevail," in other words. Good advice always! Perhaps after a hiatus on the subject we'll be able to (...) (24 years ago, 28-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
