| | Re: Chaotic Systems... (was: Re: Problems with Christianity and Darwinism)
|
|
For sequential read consecutive (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
|
| | Re: Chaotic Systems... (was: Re: Problems with Christianity and Darwinism)
|
|
(...) Almost all the draws in the UK are live. There are independent adjudicators present to confirm that there is no shenanigans underway what these peoples skills are I do not know. I doubt that you could discount a draw due to the selection (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
|
| | Re: Chaotic Systems... (was: Re: Problems with Christianity and Darwinism)
|
|
(...) Actually, I honestly wonder whether they'd 'let' such a combination pass... I'm willing to bet that if they got the combination 1,2,3,4,5,6, that lots of people would insist that it was rigged, even if it didn't happen.... I dunno what they'd (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
|
| | Re: Chaotic Systems... (was: Re: Problems with Christianity and Darwinism)
|
|
(...) If the UK lottery usage is anything to go by, I would avoid those numbers. I am sure I am right in saying it is the most common combination selected. If/when you win, you will have to share it with a lot of other players! That said, the (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
|
| | Chaotic Systems... (was: Re: Problems with Christianity and Darwinism)
|
|
(...) And I'd argue that that's JUST as likely as any other combination of numbers, accepting that each lottery number is as equally likely to appear as the next. Hence, you're fine. (...) The difference is in the inherent behavior of the system. (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|