Debate : 9041


Off-Topic / Debate / 9041	9040 \| 9042

Subject:	Re: Chaotic Systems... (was: Re: Problems with Christianity and Darwinism)
Newsgroups:	lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date:	Thu, 25 Jan 2001 17:10:14 GMT
Viewed:	1242 times

For “sequential” read “consecutive” > > I know that 1-6 is just as likely to be selected as any other ‘random’ > combination. However, I can’t help thinking that any selection is more > likely to a non-sequential combination. Further, if a sequential combination > were to be selected - it would be slightly less likely to be that one than > almost any other. > > Scott A

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: Chaotic Systems... (was: Re: Problems with Christianity and Darwinism)
(...) Well, definitely such a sequence is much less likely than a more "random looking" sequence. If you 6 numbers are the digits 1-9, there are only 4 such sequences compared to a total of 9!/3! sequences (if each digit can only occur once, 9^6 (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: Chaotic Systems... (was: Re: Problems with Christianity and Darwinism)
(...) Almost all the draws in the UK are live. There are “independent adjudicators” present to confirm that there is no shenanigans underway – what these people’s skills are I do not know. I doubt that you could discount a draw due to the selection (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

298 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search