Subject:
|
Re: Chaotic Systems... (was: Re: Problems with Christianity and Darwinism)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 25 Jan 2001 16:06:23 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1180 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Eaton writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Guy Albertelli writes:
> > I still think you are seeing patterns you find interesting.
> >
> > When I buy a lottery ticket I always get "1 2 3 4 5 6"
>
> And I'd argue that that's JUST as likely as any other combination of
> numbers, accepting that each lottery number is as equally likely to appear
> as the next. Hence, you're fine.
If the UK lottery usage is anything to go by, I would avoid those numbers. I
am sure I am right in saying it is the most common combination selected.
If/when you win, you will have to share it with a lot of other players!
That said, the combination 1, 2, 3 has never appeared in the UK.
Scott A
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Chaotic Systems... (was: Re: Problems with Christianity and Darwinism)
|
| (...) Actually, I honestly wonder whether they'd 'let' such a combination pass... I'm willing to bet that if they got the combination 1,2,3,4,5,6, that lots of people would insist that it was rigged, even if it didn't happen.... I dunno what they'd (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
298 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
