To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / *8922 (-5)
  Re: Evolution - Impossible!
 
(...) That's funny: I (and Bruce, I expect) have been thinking the same thing about the creationists in this debate. Dave! (25 years ago, 23-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Evolution - Impossible!
 
(...) I guess that's the best I can expect? Surely you can do better than name-calling - how about some specific refutation. If you won't or can't - you've closed your mind and further discussion will probably be futile. -Jon (25 years ago, 23-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Support for Creationism (was Re: Macro-Evolution - "Impossible!")
 
(...) Yes, thank you Tim, since you answered a question that Jon has ducked through dozens of posts in several debates and threads thereof. And thank you for providing some references, so that those of us who support evolution are at last able to (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Macro-Evolution - "Impossible!"
 
(...) evolution (...) Back up to the beginning and note Larry's comments - I've responded and I think that's where we can start. Meanwhile you might read Tim's post... I wanted to establish a basis for the discussion before presenting evidence - (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Macro-Evolution - "Impossible!"
 
(...) I've revised my groundwork statements in line with Larry's suggestions. If they're sufficient I will proceed. -Jon (25 years ago, 23-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR