 | | Re: Carryon vs. checked (Re: WTB: 6557 (really, really badly) and 6861
|
|
(...) Come on, everkone is KtoK compliant bk now, aren't thek? Jasper "Old hat" Janssen (26 years ago, 15-Mar-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Carryon vs. checked (Re: WTB: 6557 (really, really badly) and 6861
|
|
(...) So, I assume Lego is taxed at 6%? :-) -- Terry K -- (26 years ago, 15-Mar-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Carryon vs. checked (Re: WTB: 6557 (really, really badly) and 6861
|
|
Jasper Janssen wrote in message <36eb9d57.11798658@l...et.com>... (...) from 6% (for vital sources like bread, basic food materials) up to 25% (luxury(!) items, icluding things like home appliances, and so). (...) Packet of 20 goes for 350 000TL, (...) (26 years ago, 15-Mar-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Which Threads Ethics - Summary
|
|
Salient points IMHO are as follows: To quote Todd: "Auctions and threads do not generally have a one-to-one correspondence. Sometimes they do, but when they do, try to keep in mind that you are conducting an auction using an NNTP newsgroup system -- (...) (26 years ago, 14-Mar-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: which threads, ethics (was: Re: Mini Auction - 6273 - Rock Island Refuge)
|
|
(...) Bravo. Couldn't have (obviously) said it better myself. :) (26 years ago, 14-Mar-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: which threads, ethics (was: Re: Mini Auction - 6273 - Rock Island Refuge)
|
|
(...) I would advocate only the inclusion of an FYI note in the FAQ pointing out that this sort of thing is viewed as irritating by some people and viewed as natural by others, and further that doing this has historically been met with criticism. (...) (26 years ago, 14-Mar-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: which threads, ethics (was: Re: Mini Auction - 6273 - Rock Island Refuge)
|
|
(...) That's right. Every LUGNET design and development decision is approached with the overall near- and long-term needs of the community in mind (so near as those needs can be understood) but in the end, it is a business just as any other -- and (...) (26 years ago, 14-Mar-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: which threads, ethics (was: Re: Mini Auction - 6273 - Rock Island Refuge)
|
|
(...) Steve, could you go into a bit more detail here? I don't understand what you mean by restricting auctions to a single seller. Do you mean restricting auction threads to a single poster (the seller)? (...) Chaos maybe in terms of sifting (...) (26 years ago, 14-Mar-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Mini Auction - 6273 - Rock Island Refuge
|
|
(...) Auctions and threads do not generally have a one-to-one correspondence. Sometimes they do, but when they do, try to keep in mind that you are conducting an auction using an NNTP newsgroup system -- a text-based medium designed and optimized (...) (26 years ago, 14-Mar-99, to lugnet.market.auction, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: which threads, ethics (was: Re: Mini Auction - 6273 - Rock Island Refuge)
|
|
(...) I don't see this as an oversight at all. It's a natural part of the market dynamics and of competition in a free market. It's not something that everyone feels comfortable doing, and it's certainly not something that everyone is happy having (...) (26 years ago, 14-Mar-99, to lugnet.market.auction, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
