|
|
 | | Re: My point.
|
| (...) It's not always important that everyone agrees with you, you've just got to be careful about whether the really important people disagree with you. Like the police for instance. (...) Seems awfully strange to mention the police at a time like (...) (24 years ago, 18-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | (canceled)
|
| | | | | | Re: This sums it up
|
| Ok, It started with "this site sucks" From Matt Then "rude" Then "...this site would interest me if I were a 6 year old" From Matt And "...idolizing James Jassim as a god" From Matt Then "...provided you grow up" So on and so fourth.... Nastier and (...) (24 years ago, 18-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: My point.
|
| (...) Actually, the incident I was referring to above wasn't you -- it was someone else. But anyway... (...) I don't think I participated in that discussion. I pretty much stopped posting to RTL after 1998. I do remember reading parts of it, though. (...) (24 years ago, 18-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Sad state of affairs
|
| Matthew wrote in message <39ed018c.2602594@ne...et.com>... (...) Matthew, you seem to be unaware of one of golden rules of human life: APOLOGISE FOR BEING RUDE. You aren't being shunned for being rude. You are being shunned for being rude and being (...) (24 years ago, 17-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
|
