 | | Re: Castle Accesseries for Knight's Kingdom
|
|
You also have to consider that most people just don't care. If you go around correcting people, they're going to roll their eyes and give you that look reserved for Trekkie conventions and people like me who stood out in line all night for Star Wars (...) (24 years ago, 13-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Castle Accesseries for Knight's Kingdom
|
|
(...) I'm not disputing that. In fact, one of the first points in my original post was a recognition of the possibility of product dilution. Nor am I asserting "Legos" as the correct form; I'm simply saying that, if a person identifies a single (...) (24 years ago, 13-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Castle Accesseries for Knight's Kingdom
|
|
(...) This has nothing to due with the English language's rules for pluralization. It's a legal issue of trademark dilution. By referring to their products as LEGO bricks, LEGO building toys, etc., the Lego Company is trying to avoid having their (...) (24 years ago, 13-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Castle Accesseries for Knight's Kingdom
|
|
(...) Fair enough, but this *is* a LEGO-based discussion group, and the demographic here might reasonably be expected to make a more thoughtful effort to adhere to the "correct" form. In my experience, though, this simply doesn't pan-out to the (...) (24 years ago, 13-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Castle Accesseries for Knight's Kingdom
|
|
(...) Amen, Aaron (24 years ago, 13-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
