 | | Re: Million Mom March
|
|
(...) they (...) What does this rebut? I hear people make arguments based on the idea that the founders didn't know what weapons would be like, but I never really get how that matters. The point is that the people must have access to weapons (...) (24 years ago, 13-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Million Mom March
|
|
(...) You really think so, in today's infocentric society? Come on, you're smarter than that. If grocery stores keep track of our purchases through their stupid little "value" cards how hard do you think it would be for the government to pull (...) (24 years ago, 13-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Million Mom March
|
|
Christopher Weeks wrote in message ... (...) least (...) I would be in favor of a gun "license", however, I would like to see any group who can show that their are serious about how they give out the license being able to give them out (a huge (...) (24 years ago, 13-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Million Mom March
|
|
(...) Ignoring for a moment that this is the classic falacy of "slippery slope" reasoning, as well as the spectre of "nazi=forfeited argument," you've made a few compelling points. By the way, can you cite a web-reference for that translated Nazi (...) (24 years ago, 13-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Million Mom March
|
|
(...) When the 2nd was written, cutting-edge weapons technology took about a minute to load a single shot. Today, how long does anyone realistically think that anything other than a phenomenally large group of organized, trained, private civilians (...) (24 years ago, 13-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Million Mom March
|
|
(...) carried (...) Why should that be limited to man-portable weapons. I disagree. Since the ponit of the 2nd is clearly to keep the citizens armed to the point where they can reject the government, then all ordnance available to the government (...) (24 years ago, 13-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Million Mom March
|
|
(...) Wow. (...) Well, I don't think that it's that simple. For instance the MMM's main goal is to have universal registration federally organized. I think it is pretty clearly (mostly) possible to maintain a registry of weapons entering the nation (...) (24 years ago, 13-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Million Mom March
|
|
(...) 100 percent aggreed (...) Exactly. Did you guys know Sarah Brady fonder of Handgun Control Inc. was qouted some years ago as saying, "Socialist America can not be realized until those who would oppose us have been totally disarmed." Everyone (...) (24 years ago, 13-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Million Mom March
|
|
(...) for (...) people (...) carried (...) Preach on, Brother Larry! While I don't think that we need to be packing around assault rifles, I agree with everything else you say. They say guns kill people? Please. I've never seen a gun, even a loaded (...) (24 years ago, 13-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Million Mom March
|
|
(...) 2 points on MMM. - it's so political it's not funny. Organised by the sister in law of Susan Thomases? Like that's grass roots. Please. - If they really wanted to do something about gun violence, more gun control laws aren't what is needed. (...) (24 years ago, 13-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
