 | | Re: More religion (sort of) (was Re: More Clinton )
|
|
(...) I don't know... I think it's pretty safe to say we don't need to wait until we open the box to determine the state of the fishies existence...just listen for the sound of a satisified cat. :) (26 years ago, 25-Jan-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: More religion (sort of) (was Re: More Clinton )
|
|
(...) None and all.. I don't think the nerve gas used in S's box is very specific :) And when we open it, there'll be a collapse of waveforms to none or all. [4] Jasper (...) [4] No, I don't know what I'm talking about [6] [5] Yes, you can have (...) (26 years ago, 25-Jan-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: More religion (sort of) (was Re: More Clinton )
|
|
Jasper Janssen writes: [[Sniped some stuff]] (...) [[snipped the rest]] Why don't we put all the fish in the Schrödinger-box[1] and wait till tomorow to see which fish has survived? Mark [1] This is the box in which you put a cat and some poison and (...) (26 years ago, 25-Jan-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Okay, that's the last straw (was Re: Translating catalogues)
|
|
Larry Pieniazek wrote in message <36A9D214.F685A741@v...er.net>... (...) Much, except for that "intelligently" part, given their current course of action (when view from Lugneter's perspective). ;-) Jesse ___...___ Jesse The Jolly Jingoist Looking (...) (26 years ago, 24-Jan-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Okay, that's the last straw (was Re: Translating catalogues)
|
|
(...) OK, here you go then: "That's their right, and if you don't like it, give them whatever feedback you think might help in the hopes that they'll listen. You're certainly within you rights to make whatever non slanderous statements you wish to (...) (26 years ago, 23-Jan-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
