Debate : 366


Off-Topic / Debate / 366	365 \| 367

Subject:	Re: More religion (sort of) (was Re: More Clinton )
Newsgroups:	lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date:	Mon, 25 Jan 1999 16:13:58 GMT
Viewed:	888 times

Jasper Janssen writes: > On Mon, 25 Jan 1999 10:21:10 GMT, "Mark de Kock" <mkock@tulip.com> > wrote: > > > Why don't we put all the fish in the Schrödinger-box[1] and wait till tomorow > > to see which fish has survived? > > None and all.. I don't think the nerve gas used in S's box is very > specific :) And when we open it, there'll be a collapse of waveforms > to none or all. [4] I don't know... I think it's pretty safe to say we don't need to wait until we open the box to determine the state of the fishies existence...just listen for the sound of a satisified cat. :)

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: More religion (sort of) (was Re: More Clinton )
(...) The box is sound, light & air proof. In fact, the material used is impervious to any Electromagnetic radiation. Otherwise, the first particle/photon that it emitted and that would happen to collide with either the observer, or cause something (...) (26 years ago, 25-Jan-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: More religion (sort of) (was Re: More Clinton )
(...) None and all.. I don't think the nerve gas used in S's box is very specific :) And when we open it, there'll be a collapse of waveforms to none or all. [4] Jasper (...) [4] No, I don't know what I'm talking about [6] [5] Yes, you can have (...) (26 years ago, 25-Jan-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

118 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search