Debate : 364


Off-Topic / Debate / 364	363 \| 365

Subject:	Re: More religion (sort of) (was Re: More Clinton )
Newsgroups:	lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date:	Mon, 25 Jan 1999 10:21:10 GMT
Viewed:	510 times

Jasper Janssen writes: [[Sniped some stuff]] > Any bets on when we will see a darwin fish being eaten by a god fish > being eaten by a Nietzsche fish being eaten by a Holy Trinity fish? [[snipped the rest]] Why don't we put all the fish in the Schrödinger-box[1] and wait till tomorow to see which fish has survived? Mark [1] This is the box in which you put a cat and some poison and close the lit. After that, you can not be sure[2][3] what is real: a dead cat or a living cat. [2] without shaking da box, you cheat! [3] is it ok to put a mark in a mark?

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: More religion (sort of) (was Re: More Clinton )
(...) None and all.. I don't think the nerve gas used in S's box is very specific :) And when we open it, there'll be a collapse of waveforms to none or all. [4] Jasper (...) [4] No, I don't know what I'm talking about [6] [5] Yes, you can have (...) (25 years ago, 25-Jan-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: More religion (sort of) (was Re: More Clinton )
(...) Thanks. (...) Oh yeah, right, I think I remember seeing that once or twice now. (...) We here in the Netherlands almost never have bumper-stickers, so I guess we missed out :) (...) Any bets on when we will see a darwin fish being eaten by a (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jan-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

118 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search