To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / *28291 (-20)
  Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em???
 
(...) Yeah, I was wondering if you were reffing something specific, but I couldn't place it, coupled with the fact that I never saw Mars Attacks... (17 years ago, 21-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 
  Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em???
 
(...) I quoted.... Well, to much to list, but I'll start with Mars Attacks... :) Dave K (17 years ago, 21-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 
  Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em???
 
(...) Hey, he quoted MP and I used a smiley-- it's all good in my mind! JOHN (17 years ago, 21-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 
  Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em???
 
(...) Can't we all just... get along? Dave K (17 years ago, 21-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em???
 
(...) Pot; kettle:-) (17 years ago, 21-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 
  Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em???
 
(...) It's people like you wot cause unrest. (17 years ago, 21-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 
  Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em???
 
(...) You started the game; I was just playing along. (...) "Wasting everyone's time"??? Are you serious? The only time wasted is MINE every time I get into some insipid MPesque argument with YOU! If it's YOUR time you are worried about, DON"T (...) (17 years ago, 21-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 
  Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em???
 
(...) About as much as I'd buy some of the other assertions in this thread. ;-) Cheers Richie Dulin (17 years ago, 21-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 
  Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em???
 
(...) So you were trying to make me make a point that wasn't lost on you anyway? Why not just answer the point with some evidence instead of wasting everyone's time? (...) You did. By posting an assertion publicly with nothing to back it up. (...) (...) (17 years ago, 21-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 
  Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em???
 
(...) hehe, would you buy that the malaprop was intentional? JOHN (17 years ago, 21-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 
  Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em???
 
(...) 'Antidotal'? Do you mean 'anecdotal'? Cheers Richie Dulin (17 years ago, 21-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 
  Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em???
 
(...) How convenient. So, your point was to parody my assertion by making a non-assertion assertion yourself. Subtle. But your sublime subtlety wasn't lost on me; I just wanted you to make your point instead of trying to WOW me with your subtle (...) (17 years ago, 21-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 
  Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em???
 
(...) John, you really need to work out the subtleties of debating. That was not an assertion - it was a parody of your sentence, used to make my point. Do you actually have anything to backup your assertion? If so, why not post it here, like Dave (...) (17 years ago, 21-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 
  Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em???
 
(...) YOU: "Yeah, there will always be a few heroic, inspiring, and humbling soldiers. But don’t make the misteak in thinking that their attitudes reflect the majority." Deal. JOHN (17 years ago, 21-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 
  Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em???
 
(...) Read my post again John. In case you need a hint, the information I provided is "You made an assertion without anything to back it up". And I'll add some more information too - until you CAN back it up, your assertion is pointless. ROSCO (17 years ago, 21-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 
  Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em???
 
(...) Without providing any information of your own, your point is pointless. JOHN (17 years ago, 21-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 
  Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em???
 
(...) No I don't have nearly enough information to make such an assertion, but YOU asserted that "The overwhelming majority of US troops in Iraq are positive, incouraged, and invested in their work." (...) My point is that YOU made an assertion (...) (17 years ago, 20-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 
  Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em???
 
(...) So, are you asserting that the majority aren't heroic, inspiring, and courageous? Point, please. Or is it that you simply like to hear the sound of your own fingers tapping the keyboard? JOHN (17 years ago, 20-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 
  Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em???
 
(...) Oh yeah? You went and asked them all? (...) Yeah, there will always be a few heroic, inspiring, and humbling soldiers. But don't make the misteak in thinking that their attitudes reflect the majority. ROSCO (17 years ago, 20-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 
  Re: Peeron inventories
 
(...) I thought that I was answering David's e-mail to my e-mail address. Sorry, I am not too sure how to do all these tree things here and there. It wasn't you, It was mad David. John P (17 years ago, 20-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR