To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 28281
28280  |  28282
Subject: 
Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em???
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Wed, 21 Mar 2007 05:08:54 GMT
Viewed: 
4807 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Ross Crawford wrote:

   John, you really need to work out the subtleties of debating. That was not an assertion - it was a parody of your sentence, used to make my point.

How convenient. So, your point was to parody my assertion by making a non-assertion assertion yourself. Subtle. But your sublime subtlety wasn’t lost on me; I just wanted you to make your point instead of trying to WOW me with your subtle debating skilz.

   Do you actually have anything to backup your assertion? If so, why not post it here, like Dave did?

Why didn’t you just say that in the first place? Better yet, who asked you in the first place? You were probably just trying to be helpful using your subtle debating skilz.

But unlike you, I don’t provide evidence (in this case antidotal) for my case using the type of evidence against which I’m arguing. In fact, the lack of pro-war stories actually makes my point!

What I’m saying is that antidotal evidence of poor troop morale is an invidious tactic of the MSM to steer public opinion against the war effort. I wonder how many pro-war effort opinions were passed upon until a negative one was found and reported on. The impression left (as implied by Dave!) is that overall morale is down.

I question the judgment and the lack of bias of the writers of this story. They aren’t interested in reporting news, they are interested in forwarding an anti-war, anti-Bush agenda.

JOHN



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em???
 
(...) 'Antidotal'? Do you mean 'anecdotal'? Cheers Richie Dulin (18 years ago, 21-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
  Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em???
 
(...) So you were trying to make me make a point that wasn't lost on you anyway? Why not just answer the point with some evidence instead of wasting everyone's time? (...) You did. By posting an assertion publicly with nothing to back it up. (...) (...) (18 years ago, 21-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em???
 
(...) John, you really need to work out the subtleties of debating. That was not an assertion - it was a parody of your sentence, used to make my point. Do you actually have anything to backup your assertion? If so, why not post it here, like Dave (...) (18 years ago, 21-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

115 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR